A- A+
Media Replies

Response by SFA and MOH on food safety incident during Food Resilience Preparedness Programme

icon-calendar

15 Apr 2025

             The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) and the Ministry of Health have concluded investigations for the food safety incident during this year’s Food Resilience Preparedness Programme (FRPP), where 187 individuals (about 0.2 per cent of those who consumed the meals) were verified with gastroenteritis symptoms. Based on investigation findings, there is no conclusive evidence linking the reported gastroenteritis cases to the consumption of RTE meals.

2          This means that both food safety and clinical findings did not pinpoint the Ready-to-Eat (RTE) meals as the definitive cause of the incident. The laboratory testing of RTE meal samples, the environmental swabs of equipment and contact surfaces in SATS’ premises as well as stool samples from affected individuals and food handlers, showed no foodborne pathogens. SFA’s investigation of the manufacturing premises and processes also found no food safety lapses. Nonetheless, SFA is working closely with SATS to review and strengthen their food production processes.

3            Food safety is a joint responsibility. Everyone can play a part to ensure food safety through safe and hygienic practices, such as washing hands with soap thoroughly before consumption of food. 

4             SFA will continue to ensure a strong food safety regime and enhance Singapore’s food resilience. 


 

 


 

Issued by the Singapore Food Agency and Ministry of Health
15 April 2025

 

We welcome your feedback
Help us improve your experience on SFA's revamped corporate website by doing a 5-minute survey.
Which of the following best describes you?

Check any that apply:

Which of the following best describes the reason for your visit to our website?
Were you able to locate the information or services you needed today?

Please tell us why.

Please tell us why.

What is your overall satisfaction level with our website?

Very dissatisfied

Very satisfied

Availability of Content / Information

Very dissatisfied

Very satisfied

Ease of Navigation

Very dissatisfied

Very satisfied

Visual Design
How would you rate our website when compared to other government websites?

Very poor

Very good

Availability of Content / Information

Very poor

Very good

Ease of Navigation

Very poor

Very good

Visual Design
Do you have any other feedback or suggestions to improve our website?
0
/ 200
Back to Top icon

Top